<label id="zo511"></label>
  1. <button id="zo511"></button>

  2. <tbody id="zo511"><code id="zo511"></code></tbody>

  3. <nobr id="zo511"><code id="zo511"></code></nobr>
  4. <label id="zo511"><output id="zo511"></output></label>
    <output id="zo511"></output><strong id="zo511"><output id="zo511"></output></strong><tbody id="zo511"><var id="zo511"></var></tbody>

  5. <optgroup id="zo511"><input id="zo511"></input></optgroup>

      當前位置: 網站彩票平台 > 學院概況 > 師資隊伍 > 正文


      • 閱讀次數:
      • 添加時間: 2019-03-06
      • 發布:管理員


      系、所:英語系  職稱:講師        

      辦公室: 外語中心703  















        1. Xiang, M. 2015. Review of Esther Pascual, Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4): 709–716. (SSCI,A&HCI)   

          2. Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. (2016). Debate with Zhuangzi: Expository Questions as Fictive Interaction Blends in an Old Chinese Text. Pragmatics 26(1): 137-162. (SSCI,A&HCI)   

          3.Xiang, M. (2016). Real, Imaginary, or Fictive? Philosophical Dialogues in an Early Daoist Text and its Pictorial Version. In E. Pascual & S. Sandler (Eds.). The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  

          4. Xu, J.& M. Xiang*. (2019). Review of Blending Technologies in Second Language Classrooms. Don Hinkelman. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Pp. Xxxii + 407. System. (SSCI)   

          5. Xiang, M.& B. Ma. (2019). How Can I Persuade You Without Making Self-assertions? A Cognitive Rhetorical Analysis of the Use of Fictive Questions in an Early Daoist Text. In Ana Moreno-Nu?n?ez, Vera DaSilva Sinha & Zhen Tian (Eds.). Signs of Life: Changes and Continuity in Language, Thought and Identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

          6. Xiang, M., E. Pascual & B. Ma. (Forth.). Who's speaking for whom? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. (SSCI, A&HCI)



          1.Xiang, M. Real, imaginary, or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in an early Daoist text and its pictorial version presented at The Conversation Frame Expert Workshop, 5-6 June 2014, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
          2. Xiang, M & E. Pascual. Translating the invisible: Fictive questions in an Old Chinese text and its English translations presented at the 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 20-25 July 2015, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
          3. Xiang, M. How can I persuade you? A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an old Chinese text presented at the 7th International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (DGKL/GCLA), 5-7 October 2016, University Duisburg-Essen,Essen, Germany.
          4.Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. Can rhetorical questions have matched polarity? Evidence from classical Chinese presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference, 16-21 July 2017,Belfast, UK.
          5.Xiang, M. Who's speaking? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, 23-26 October 2018, Braga, Portugal.
          6.Xiang, M. & A. Bonifazi. The form is the message: A comparative cognitive rhetorical study of the philosophical dialogues by Zhuangzi and Plato presented at the Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference 2019, 26-28 September 2019, Bialystok, Poland.


          1. 浙江大學第四屆學生人文社會科學研究優秀成果獎 研究生優秀成果特等獎